Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 08:12:59 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: Robert Marella <hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as Message-ID: <d9175cad050212061229ddc8ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1108178611.46376.17.camel@p4> References: <200502112325.j1BNPw201164@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <1108168477.45718.19.camel@p4> <d9175cad05021117183a207ff@mail.gmail.com> <1108178611.46376.17.camel@p4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Agreed, but have you never inherited control over a system with hardware > you did not purchase? Yup, but I've simply not gotten unsupported hardware. In the many computers I've tried, not a single piece of hardware unsupported, from network cards to raid cards, wireless and video, serial cards and etc... > Growth is a natural thing. If we have 2% of the market and we grow 5% > but the market grows 20%, we loose share. Vendors look at the market. We > need to capture a larger share to make them sit up and take notice. Right, but since the key to our advertisement is the exclusivity of who hears about us, we'd be getting the finest 2% available, and I, for one, am plenty happy with that. I'm perfectly content with the 2% that understand that closed-source, proprietary, sub-standard operating systems are inferior regardless of how large their userbase is. -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9175cad050212061229ddc8ae>