Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:40:06 +0300
From:      Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>
To:        Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS...
Message-ID:  <31095B59-630A-44E3-B68F-530C6A0AEC35@digsys.bg>
In-Reply-To: <d0118f7e-7cfc-8bf1-308c-823bce088039@denninger.net>
References:  <30506b3d-64fb-b327-94ae-d9da522f3a48@sorbs.net> <CAOtMX2gf3AZr1-QOX_6yYQoqE-H%2B8MjOWc=eK1tcwt5M3dCzdw@mail.gmail.com> <56833732-2945-4BD3-95A6-7AF55AB87674@sorbs.net> <3d0f6436-f3d7-6fee-ed81-a24d44223f2f@netfence.it> <17B373DA-4AFC-4D25-B776-0D0DED98B320@sorbs.net> <70fac2fe3f23f85dd442d93ffea368e1@ultra-secure.de> <70C87D93-D1F9-458E-9723-19F9777E6F12@sorbs.net> <CAGMYy3tYqvrKgk2c==WTwrH03uTN1xQifPRNxXccMsRE1spaRA@mail.gmail.com> <5ED8BADE-7B2C-4B73-93BC-70739911C5E3@sorbs.net> <d0118f7e-7cfc-8bf1-308c-823bce088039@denninger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 30 Apr 2019, at 16:11, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> My experience is that ZFS is materially more-resilient but there is no
> such thing as "can never be corrupted by any set of events."  Backup
> strategies for moderately large (e.g. many Terabytes) to very large
> (e.g. Petabytes and beyond) get quite complex but they're also very
> necessary.
>=20

I can only second that statement. Being paranoid with your data (keep =
many copies, have many backups) is never enough.

A colleague just complained the other day, that they lost a zpool and =
that ZFS didn=E2=80=99t save their data=E2=80=A6. by not making a =
redundant pool and the hard drive  trashing heads. And no backups. The =
unreadable part of the drive happened in metadata and the pool can not =
be imported.

I keep an HDD around, that since it was brand new, runs perfectly under =
any OS. Rock solid, that is=E2=80=A6 and only ZFS complains that it =
reads things back it didn=E2=80=99t write. Before that, I would think =
UFS was ok=E2=80=A6 since then, I don=E2=80=99t build a single =
installation, that does not have at least a mirrored ZFS pool. And =
=E2=80=9Carchive servers=E2=80=9D (stands for backup) have become the =
central focus of my work. These are never enough..

Daniel




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?31095B59-630A-44E3-B68F-530C6A0AEC35>