Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 13:48:20 -0800 From: Eric Melville <eric@FreeBSD.org> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk> Cc: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org>, "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>, binup@FreeBSD.org, libh@FreeBSD.org, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Subject: Re: current project steps Message-ID: <20011028134820.D15301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20011027210157.D1534@tao.org.uk>; from joe@tao.org.uk on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:01:57PM %2B0100 References: <20011020202153.A76835@FreeBSD.org> <20011026135930.03D1637B406@hub.freebsd.org> <20011026165952.D11804@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> <20011026221254.A36515@tao.org.uk> <20011026172027.F11804@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> <20011026223033.A44573@tao.org.uk> <20011027131726.A68253@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> <20011027210157.D1534@tao.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It sounds to me that libh has its fingers in too many pies. It's not a > clean API; and should be split into several, or rely on others. The API > that we're talking about here is one such that the libh API should rely > on for its job of managing packages, but at the moment it's trying to > dig too deep IMO. It's a bit like an application also implementing TCP > and ethernet drivers in one library. The project has a somewhat bizarre name, because libh sort of implies -lh. This isn't the case, it isn't a single library at all. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-binup" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011028134820.D15301>