Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Apr 2021 10:36:29 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
To:        Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org>
Cc:        doc-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-doc-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: c5f5a82112 - main - FAQ: Update bits about getting a ports tree
Message-ID:  <20210422083629.oaalgv4ae4o67kgw@aching.in.mat.cc>
In-Reply-To: <6d8a9c8f-4c12-26ab-2d48-0978b95e31b3@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202104191008.13JA8Rng066319@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20210419104851.ygnf5l74lbby7zf5@aching.in.mat.cc> <2eea18b9-a493-15ce-47e7-897540929c81@FreeBSD.org> <20210419122400.u7h6xzypr243e62m@aching.in.mat.cc> <6d8a9c8f-4c12-26ab-2d48-0978b95e31b3@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--hyog5b4np3n7h7km
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:24:20AM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 19/04/2021 10:24 pm, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:28:08PM +0200, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> > > On 19/04/2021 12:48, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:08:27AM +0000, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> > > > > The branch main has been updated by 0mp:
> > > > >=20
> > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=3Dc5f5a82112f0de78da=
06ae73c19e4c99d4bb3111
> > > > >=20
> > > > > commit c5f5a82112f0de78da06ae73c19e4c99d4bb3111
> > > > > Author:     Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org>
> > > > > AuthorDate: 2021-04-19 10:00:11 +0000
> > > > > Commit:     Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org>
> > > > > CommitDate: 2021-04-19 10:00:11 +0000
> > > > >=20
> > > > >       FAQ: Update bits about getting a ports tree
> > > > >       - Link to the portsnap manual
> > > > >       - Replace Subversion with Git
> > > > Might want to provide other means to get the ports tree than portsn=
ap,
> > > > it is not really supported any more, say, gitup for example.
> > >=20
> > > Good point overall but isn't portsnap being brought back at the momen=
t?
> >=20
> > Mmmm, this is a separate issue, portsnap may work, it is just not a
> > supported way to get the ports tree.
>=20
> It's not? The community is hearing conflicting information about this.

portsnap is fragile, portmgr has had absolutely no success in having
things evolved for years, and while it was great in the old CVS times
where networks were flacky, and CVS was hard to use, there has been
better alternatives, with svn, there was svnup, and with git, there is
gitup.  Both use the repository directly, and don't require a third
party middleware.

--=20
Mathieu Arnold

--hyog5b4np3n7h7km
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8Qtp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--hyog5b4np3n7h7km--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210422083629.oaalgv4ae4o67kgw>