Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 07:13:04 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen sysconf.c Message-ID: <20030106131304.GA32011@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <20030106043730.GA24930@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200209210214.g8L2E4Wc086892@freefall.freebsd.org> <20030106043730.GA24930@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 08:37:31PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On a related note, why should 'LOGIN_NAME_MAX' be a run-time value? > One of the most common use of it is "char foo[LOGIN_NAME_MAX];". I'm similarly annoyed that we don't define HOST_NAME_MAX. I believe I understand Garrett's reasoning, but I do not agree with it. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030106131304.GA32011>