Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Dec 2002 09:42:35 +0200
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Alex <akruijff@dds.nl>, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, Johnson David <DavidJohnson@Siemens.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 80386 out of GENERIC
Message-ID:  <20021217074235.GA95679@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021215223540.GB97271@wantadilla.lemis.com>
References:  <24244.1039900460@critter.freebsd.dk> <9710634521.20021214232526@dds.nl> <3DFC0AB1.D60AAF66@mindspring.com> <20021215223540.GB97271@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:05:40AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 December 2002 at 20:53:05 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Alex wrote:
> >> It means that you can not install FreeBSD on a 386 unless you have a
> >> 486+ machine that can compile a new FreeBSD system and have a way to
> >> get that version to the 386.
> >
> > Yes, this is true.  Several of us were annoyed by the change,
> > which appeared at the time to have been done solely to handle
> > the fact that the newly installed device /dev/random sucked
> > too much CPU time to work on a 386.
>=20
> That's an interesting apparition.  In fact, it was done because the
> locking primitives for i386 are so different from those for later
> machines that they would significantly slow down all i[>3]86 kernels.
> Since that's the vast majority, it doesn't make sense.
>=20
> I suppose it would be a good idea to include an alternatvie i386
> kernel on the CD-ROM.  There may be a space issue, of course.  How
> many people participating in this thread have an i386 with at least 12
> MB of memory and intended to try 5.0 on it?  How many of those don't
> have a machine to bootstrap off?
>=20
Having only alternative i386 kernel is not enough while userland
stuff is still compiled for i486.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9/tVrUkv4P6juNwoRAl9dAKCIGlFooxhP6bEHYmuNyICUa6Jx7gCeLtq1
PA8LBexTWxAOglBMGlVjRks=
=lfaA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021217074235.GA95679>