Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:04:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys socketvar.h Message-ID: <20060315190416.V36621@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060315185909.GA16188@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <200603151230.k2FCU6sH042768@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060315185909.GA16188@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > +> Add SS_PROTOREF socket flag, which represents a strong reference by the > +> protocol to the socket. Normally protocol references are weak: that is, > +> the socket layer can tear down the socket (and hence protocol state) > +> when it finds convenient. This flag will allow the protocol to > +> explicitly declare to the socket layer that it is maintaining a > +> strong reference, rather than the current implicit model associated > +> with so_pcb pointer values and repeated attempts to possibly free the > +> socket. > [...] > +> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ extern struct mtx accept_mtx; > +> #define SS_ASYNC 0x0200 /* async i/o notify */ > +> #define SS_ISCONFIRMING 0x0400 /* deciding to accept connection req */ > +> #define SS_ISDISCONNECTED 0x2000 /* socket disconnected from peer */ > +> +#define SS_PROTOREF 0x400 /* strong protocol reference */ > > You probably wanted 0x4000 here, no 0x400 which is already defined as > SS_ISCONFIRMING. Indeed. I decided to hand type the change instead of cutting down the current sockref patch to one chunk, and obviously that was a bad idea. Thanks! Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060315190416.V36621>