Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 16:21:26 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syscons.c Message-ID: <19980415162126.63181@follo.net> In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3Cxzp7m4r6yep=2Efsf=40hrotti=2Eifi=2Euio=2Eno=3E=3B_from?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?_Dag-Erling_Coidan_Sm=F8rgrav__on_Wed=2C_Apr_15=2C_1998_a?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?t_02=3A51=3A26PM_%2B0200?= References: <199804151212.OAA12483@sos.freebsd.dk> <xzp7m4r6yep.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav wrote: > Søren Schmidt <sos@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > In reply to Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav who wrote: > > > OK, I committed this to the 1.182.2 branch which is what goes into > > > STABLE unless I am mistaken. > > What about -current ?? > > I'm afraid to touch -current as long as I don't run it myself. Things should in general go into -current before going into -stable. Things one is 'afraid of touching' should definately go in -current first, if the code in -current and -stable is similar - it is much much much better to break -current than -stable, and -current is the codebase that will be carried forward - if it is only done in 2.2, it is likely to disappear when we go 3.0... Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980415162126.63181>