Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:51:43 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: <davids@nswcc.org.au> Cc: <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Y2K compliance question Message-ID: <199901150051.TAA26690@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <D0D9AB571768D211AA150008C74CF8E4027B58@MERCURY> References: <D0D9AB571768D211AA150008C74CF8E4027B58@MERCURY>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 15 Jan 1999 09:56:38 +1100, david schanzer <davids@nswcc.org.au> said: > version. Is version 2.0 Y2K compliant, No. > and if not, what is the minimum > version for which your statement, "After extensive analysis and testing, we > believe that FreeBSD is 100% Y2K compliant", is true? That which is currently available at the head of the source tree. We have continued to examine the software, and have been making fixes as the most obscure bugs are identified. (Not all of these bugs are strictly Y2000 problems.) By examining the repository (either directly or through the FreeBSD.ORG Web pages) you can determine whether the specific fixes listed on the Y2K page are included in the version of the system you have. We believe that there are no bugs remaining which would cause erroneous operation of a previously working system; however, there may be some problems remaining in user-interface functionality and third-party software. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901150051.TAA26690>