Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:50:20 +0100 From: Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net> To: Darren Pilgrim <dmp@bitfreak.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What's the status of vinum? Message-ID: <1092649820.821.2.camel@inferno.sixth.bishnet.net> In-Reply-To: <001d01c48372$a4b5e130$142a15ac@spud> References: <001d01c48372$a4b5e130$142a15ac@spud>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 10:23, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > I'm currently doing a vinum RAID 1 on a box that runs RELENG_4_8. For > what I do, at least, RELENG_5_2 "feels worthy" of a production box and > I'd really like to take advantage of some features 4.x doesn't have. > The threads on vinum/gvinum have me wondering if I should hold off a > bit. What's the current condition of gvinum? How well does > vinum/gvinum work in RELENG_5_2? What are the features not yet > implemented in gvinum? My eyeballs didn't capture any URLs for a status > page, but if someone can point me at one, that would be great. I'm currently using RELENG_5_2 with vinum (not gvinum). It's mirroring everything except swap, which I vaguely recall might not have worked. I believe with -CURRENT that vinum might not work right, and gvinum might be the only option. Then again I could be wrong :-) When 5.2 is released gvinum should be the default, and should hopefully be in a finished state. Cheers, Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092649820.821.2.camel>