Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:38:17 +0200 From: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> To: Ruben de Groot <mail25@bzerk.org>, Steve Bertrand <steve@ibctech.ca>, John Almberg <jalmberg@identry.com>, vogelke+unix@pobox.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should DNS be on same server as webserver? Message-ID: <4A5C43F9.2080003@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <20090714081624.GA27636@ei.bzerk.org> References: <20090713222746.5D519BF05@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> <7DD18C43-5B03-4624-9487-ACC4AFAF000F@identry.com> <4A5C0DB3.5090205@ibctech.ca> <20090714081624.GA27636@ei.bzerk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:46:43AM -0400, Steve Bertrand typed: >> John Almberg wrote: >>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 6:27 PM, Karl Vogel wrote: >>>> You can fix the security problems by dumping Bind and using djbdns. > > What security problems? This one ? :) > http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2812 > It's the old 'my product is better' discussion: some people like Mercedes, other people BMW, 'American Cars' are always better, and some people like Volvo's. To prove they're right, they try to find why the other products are not as good as theirs, and keep holding onto old bugs and prejudices. I'm a happy bind user for years now (and I use sendmail as well). Peter -- http://www.boosten.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A5C43F9.2080003>