Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:24:08 -0700 (PDT) From: The Clark Family <res03db2@gte.net> To: Danny Howard <dannyman@tellme.com> Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using FreeBSD to Sell Sun Hardware Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006221420570.48106-100000@orthanc.dsl.gtei.net> In-Reply-To: <20000622125314.A21088@never.tellme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sun has stayed suprisingly far away from FreeBSD. Which is weird, considering their early SunOS days. Apple is doing things with BSD. Intel sells (some) BSD based stuff. CISCO has some BSD skeletons in their closet. MS uses BSD. Who does that leave? IBM? Compaq? HP? [RC] On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Danny Howard wrote: > Hey! > > Recently, I asked a Netscape employee if Directory Server might be ported to > FreeBSD any time soon. He said it was less likely because of the Sun > alliance. I followed up with an argument that by not supporting FreeBSD, they > were all the less likely to sell Sun hardware in the end. How does my > argument sound? Critiques? Suggestions? > > Thanks, > -danny > > ----- Forwarded message from Danny Howard <dannyman@tellme.com> ----- > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:19:17AM -0700, *********** wrote: > > dannyman wrote: > [...] > > > So, are you guys ever going to port your server products to FreeBSD? > > > > Probably less likely now (with the Sun/Netscape Alliance). Of course, if > > the market for FreeBSD products really took off... > > It seems like you have a chicken and an egg. > > On the one hand, you want Directory Server to force more Sparc sales. > On the other hand, you want to sell Directory Server as widely as possible. > > So, a customer wants to evaluate different directory servers, but they don't > have spare Sparc hardware laying around, they aren't going to bother with NT, > and they really don't feel like provisioning a Linux box because they remember > last time they went through all the trouble to do so for a Netscape Server > product it just wouldn't install anyway because of some inconsistency with the > installed JDK. > > On the other hand, OpenLDAP is ready to go in about five minutes from the > FreeBSD ports collection. > > So, the first thing I'll eval is OpenLDAP, and given the bar to evaluating > NDS, if OpenLDAP does a decent job of satisfying my requirements, I'm more > likely to deploy that, and I'm more likely to stick with inexpensive x86 > hardware, because that's what I evaled on, and my LDAP vendor isn't extolling > the virtues of rolling out a deployment on Sun hardware. > > Though I'm not sure you're the best person to toss my arguments at? (Maybe > you can tell me who I should throw my argument at?) > > Thank you for your time. > -danny > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006221420570.48106-100000>