Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 10:34:22 +1100 From: Jonathan Michaels <jon@welearn.com.au> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Colin <cwass99@home.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bug-fixing previous -RELEASE, was Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <19991128103420.A95893@phoenix.welearn.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911261234460.66714-100000@hub.freebsd.org>; from Kris Kennaway on Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:43:04PM -0800 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.991126130751.29031A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911261234460.66714-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 12:43:04PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Forrest W. Christian wrote: > > > (Leaving Jordan's original message for context) > > > > I think I just "got it". Is the following description correct: > > Unfortunately it looks like Jordan misinterpreted your question - you were > right the first time. Once a -RELEASE is out the door it stays that way. A > -RELEASE is a snapshot of -STABLE at a particular point in tim (see the > FAQ for a pretty ascii picture of the process). > > You were asking for a track which is "-RELEASE + bugfixes", which doesn't > strictly exist -- but the thing which most people seem to be missing in > this discussion is that what goes into -stable *IS* 95% bugfixes (or > trivial changes like adding an option to a command). Trying to add major > new features from -current often has the nasty habit of breaking things, > so it isn't done much, and most of the new features come in the next > (x.0-RELEASE) version. > > -STABLE seems to be what you (and a lot of other people in this > discussion) want, you just might not know it. thanks for explaining this properly for the first time ... i've been wondering aboout this very question for some 4 years now. i'll beg this question, though, how does one track -stable, "properly" ? or put anouter way, is it possible to pick and choose the patches (updates) that come down the cvs pipe every night ? i ask this in light of you remarks concerning what -stable real is, and in context of its position in the overal scheme of things. to go on .. the impression i got from the original question is that this person (me and others i dare with rather limited resources as well) might find the traffic some what financially trying, given most f the rest of the world still charges internet access by the byte as well as by the minute. tracking the whole tree could run up a tidy bill, not a real probelm for those in the trade so to speak but us "hangers on". it would be nice to have a -stable that would allow us to pick and chooose the fixes we would add given our particular needs and or overall systems stratagies. and, so we return to the original proposition, being, a -release (sau 2 or 3 times a year, to allow for good regression testing and QA) with a stream of mix and match bug fixes. advertised and delivered as spec'd this would make a far more reasonable intranet customer pallitable offering than what we currently have. we currently cater for the developers and the educational requirements, as well as the very very small niche at the tope of the internet pyramid .. the services povidors, but the bulk of the middle (where most of the work and value really) is left out to dry so to speak .. ok i'm starting to froth at the mouth sorry. regards jonathan -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991128103420.A95893>