Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:54:37 -0500 From: Brian Reichert <reichert@numachi.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interesting speed benchmarks Message-ID: <20070127165437.GB41546@numachi.com> In-Reply-To: <20070126224352.GD927@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <17850.11127.944124.276290@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <200701261733.l0QHXdY1078259@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070126224352.GD927@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:43:52AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Note that dump/restore is the only tool that can correctly reproduce > sparse files. tar, cpio and pax also have filename and file size > restrictions. I don't think that cpio or pax support ACLs or file > flags. I thought 'star' handled sparse files and all the extra magic? Not that this is germaine to the topic at hand... > -- > Peter Jeremy -- Brian Reichert <reichert@numachi.com> 55 Crystal Ave. #286 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1725 USA BSD admin/developer at large
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070127165437.GB41546>