Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 23:46:28 +0200 From: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/hs-zip-archive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-binary Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/devel/hs-darcs/files patch-Setup.lhs patch-darcs.cabal ports/devel/hs-darcs Makefile distinfo pkg-d Message-ID: <AANLkTil2ds1NMcOVfF6_R3bCkIb1SPOnLMkagLWt90nk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> wrote: > I think that's a very bad idea - hs- prefixes (as well as py-/p5- > etc.) should not be applied to end-user applications, and this is > a huge POLA violation. I was thinking about creating slave ports with the original name for the "popular" ports. What do you think? Cheers, :g
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTil2ds1NMcOVfF6_R3bCkIb1SPOnLMkagLWt90nk>