Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 03:57:56 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@freebsd.org> To: Kyle Martin <mkm@ieee.org> Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wc(1) patch for review Message-ID: <20020301035756.C7544@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020301023255.A39275@marvin.idsi.net>; from mkm@ieee.org on Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:32:55AM -0600 References: <20020301023255.A39275@marvin.idsi.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kyle Martin <mkm@ieee.org> writes: > heres a patch to take care of wc's -m argument, option, which evedently is the same as -c. i left -c in their but it could easily be taken out No, this isn't quite right. See the rationale in POSIX.1-2001 which describes the difference between these options. Also, this task has already been assigned to Tim Robbins. In future, please check the project status board to reduce duplicate work. http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/c99/ Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020301035756.C7544>