Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:38:43 -0400
From:      Steven Kreuzer <skreuzer@exit2shell.com>
To:        Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Cc:        "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>, ports@freebsd.org, portmgr-feedback@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken
Message-ID:  <20080430143843.GA56269@scruffy.exit2shell.com>
In-Reply-To: <118009C5-4335-487D-BCF4-321A5824C03A@khera.org>
References:  <20080429064818.E6FF71CFE5@mail.droso.net> <48182C5C.6000807@p6m7g8.com> <118009C5-4335-487D-BCF4-321A5824C03A@khera.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 10:27:14AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> 
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 4:22 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> 
> >> portname:           www/rt3
> 
> seriously, who still uses RT 3.0?  RT 3.6 is current, and the beta of  
> the next major version just came out.

And RT 3.6.6 is available in ports (www/rt36). I personally think rt3
should be marked for deletion. 3.0.12 was the last release from the 3.0
series and was released close to 4 years ago without an update to that branch
since then.

However, since someone stepped up to maintain it, I guess if they can fix the
port so it no longer uses a random gid, might as well keep it around.

-- 
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080430143843.GA56269>