Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 17:09:15 -0700 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> Cc: kde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: Big change to x11/kde3 (Read carefully!) Message-ID: <20030603000915.GE81874@procyon.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20030602195937.V2676@volatile.chemikals.org> References: <20030602231303.GA28072@rot13.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306021824010.29494-100000@pancho> <20030602233551.GC81874@procyon.firepipe.net> <20030602194350.O2676@volatile.chemikals.org> <20030602235744.GD81874@procyon.firepipe.net> <20030602195937.V2676@volatile.chemikals.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:04:20PM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote: > You may disagree with this, but in some circles being a *user* makes my > opinion more important than the opinion of developers. I'm sure everyone > will get used to the new behavior and adapt, but I still see it as a loss. Do you actually know what happened with the meta-port today? All that changed was the restoration of old behavior (and the addition of a knob for the ignorant users that don't know kdebase is a minimal KDE install). Who lost what today? The meta-port was never customizable to the extent that you want, nor is there a good reason to do that. Again, I ask, what is wrong with typing "portinstall kdebase <kde-whatever>" as opposed to your solution, to add this list to /etc/make.conf? Regards, -- wca
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030603000915.GE81874>