Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:53:49 -0200
From:      JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports security branch
Message-ID:  <200512201053.49465.joao@matik.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <43A7F875.4010903@mail.ru>
References:  <43A7A3F7.7060500@mail.ru> <20051220110315.GA66112@melkor.kh405.net> <43A7F875.4010903@mail.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 10:26, rihad wrote:

>
> FreeBSD's "latest and greatest" attitude is very relevant for desktop
> users and such. I think it would be even better to make
> security-conscious server admins' lives even better. Put up a box,
> forget about it, do a major upgrade in a year. Oversimplifying here...
> _______________________________________________

I would not agree with you, even if the ports are getting better and better=
=20
they are still a all-in-one-package and often not suitable for any adm=20
especially the security-conscious one.=20

A webserver or a router need some software only and well compiled and=20
configured it is better than having a large ports-tree on the machine and=20
then when upgrading some shit happens and some config is deleted like it us=
ed=20
to be with mailman, spamassassin and others. The risk is too big.

The ports collection is nice and easy for most users like it is but since y=
ou=20
already compared to linux, I tell you that aptget  or yum really seems to b=
e=20
better until you get in nasty troubles after compiling a new kernel and som=
e=20
packages do not work anymore. Then you go to love portupgrade again and the=
=20
=46reeBSD system is clearly better because the ports do not depend on kerne=
l=20
versions.

Also you can portupgrade only some ports without running into too much=20
dependency troubles.

Jo=E3o








A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200512201053.49465.joao>