Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:06:06 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Status of lukemftpd? (was: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf (fwd)) Message-ID: <20021028013606.GW69631@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021026223114.73222A-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <20021027021440.GB58312@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1021026223114.73222A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 26 October 2002 at 22:59:02 -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:17:09PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: >>> Given that lukemftpd is highly feature incomplete with regards to the >>> default ftpd, I'd like to propose at least the following: >> >> What "default" ftpd? We don't have one anymore. I consider it a HUGE >> feature that lukemftpd doesn't do PAM. Like the new "standards" >> headers, PAM has done nothing for me over what I had in pre-PAM'ized >> FreeBSD, but cause great pain. Yet another promiss of something the >> better and easier that has not turned out to be the case. > > You seem to have ignored the remainder of my questions, including whether > or not you plan to add support for login.conf to lukemftpd, which is > required to support: > > ... Has anybody thought of talking to lukem about this? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021028013606.GW69631>