Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 11:10:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@pike.osd.bsdi.com>, Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051109000.11930-100000@zeppo.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying > > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two > > I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you > can have a "bus 0" on many different hoses. Eg, its directly tied > to the nexus & not behind a ppb. > > Does that make sense? Hrmm. Okay. I guess so. > > > > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have > > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses). > > Actually, that would be the most interesting to test. Obviously. But i wanted to get something booted with a kernel newer than 12 days old first. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0009051109000.11930-100000>