Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:17:53 +0100 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Also seeing 2 x quad-core system slower that 2 x dual core Message-ID: <b41c75520711291017h25050638v85b849b9538c60f2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1Ixnn6-000GXE-CZ@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> References: <b41c75520711290757w6c004602kc529676ae04a31b6@mail.gmail.com> <E1Ixnn6-000GXE-CZ@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > ULE- or 4BSD-scheduler? > > 4BSD - am just running GENERIC on both system. Should I try ULE? ULE has shown several improvements compared to 4BSD with more than one cpu. It's worth trying but may not improve the rm-rimes. > > Bit OT: Are the servers DL360 or DL380 (G5)? I will upgrade a DL380 > > server from 6.2 to 7.0 (beta3) in order to gain some performance > > tomorrow. > > Both the old and new are DL360 G5 according the the iLo. Let us know > how the upgrade goes. I will. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520711291017h25050638v85b849b9538c60f2>