Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:05:55 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Richard Stanaford <rsstan@yahoo.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bioscall.s Message-ID: <20000717150555.A63417@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com>; from rsstan@yahoo.com on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:32:03PM -0700 References: <20000717213203.7240.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:32:03PM -0700, Richard Stanaford wrote: > > Yes, it has been documented all over the place in this mailing list. > > It is also documented in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > > You should review the expectations of running -STABLE and consider if you > > are better off just sticking with the released product. ..snip.. > And I see nothing regarding bioscall.s. In the 50+ messages on this topic in this mailing list in the past _2_ weeks, some of them _have_ mentioned bioscall.s explicitly. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000717150555.A63417>