Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 16:12:04 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Clearing up the differences between TAG names (was Re: Yet another Adaptec 2940UW problem) Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970422161204.00a67720@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <26347.861738712@time.cdrom.com> References: <Your message of "Tue, 22 Apr 1997 15:50:35 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19970422155035.00abc620@sentex.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:51 PM 4/22/97 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >See http://www.freebsd.org/handbook and see the section on staying >syncronized with FreeBSD. It's all there, honest. :) Looking at http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook239.html#480, I just want to make sure that RELENG_2_2 is stable in terms of the code that is committed there is considered stable as opposed to semi-developmental etc... --------- tag=RELENG_2_2 The line of development for FreeBSD-2.2.x. tag=RELENG_2_1_0 The line of development for FreeBSD-2.1.x, also known as FreeBSD-stable. ------------- Call me a whimp, but I would feel better if I saw "also known as FreeBSD-2.2-stable" on the second line of the above quotation ;-) Thanks, ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa (mike@sentex.net) * To do is to be -- Nietzsche Sentex Communications Corp, * To be is to do -- Sartre Cambridge, Ontario * Do be do be do -- Sinatra (http://www.sentex.net/~mdtancsa) *
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.19970422161204.00a67720>