Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:25:25 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Sort of off-topic (was: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ?) Message-ID: <87y73ko01m.fsf_-_@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <200807291454.02456.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:54:02 -0400") References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080705213500.GC29380@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <86hca9pst7.fsf@ds4.des.no> <200807291454.02456.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:54:02 -0400, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > The "solution" the kmail folks think is appropriate is to explicitly > configure a list of known aliases for each mailing list. Yes, some MUAs support that sort of stuff. My mail.freebsd.current folder in Gnus has the property list: ((to-list . "freebsd-current@freebsd.org") (auto-expire . t)) I this this isn't a feature for playing smart games behind my back though. It just lets me hit 'a' (add post) when the folder is open or my pointer is over it to post a message to the Right(TM) address, but other than that most of the usual rules for Mail-Followup-To, Reply-To and the rest of the 'standard' MUA behavior work pretty much as expected.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87y73ko01m.fsf_-_>