Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:49:01 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need for another mutex type/flag? Message-ID: <20090125094901.GE41248@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090125094342.GD41248@hoeg.nl> References: <497BA91D.805@elischer.org> <20090125094342.GD41248@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote: > I thought we already supported something like that. Isn't > THREAD_NO_SLEEPING() and THREAD_SLEEPING_OK() exactly what you describe? Oh wait, never mind. That only prevents a thread from sleeping on a sleepqueue. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkl8NYwACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUNMwCfW1YyQDMxOkk371gW0Nh9Wy3G iKQAnAv47Uq580sP6EbthCOCftLHNOdm =WAD6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nG7dHWd/DOCuxGWF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090125094901.GE41248>