Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:46:41 -0700 From: Zachary Loafman <zml@FreeBSD.org> To: Sujit K M <kmsujit@gmail.com> Cc: steven.danneman@isilon.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pthread_setugid_np Message-ID: <20090528024640.GC9388@isilon.com> In-Reply-To: <74fe56020905271931l4c8d4677h3bbcce6d8c8a8605@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090528000147.GB3704@isilon.com> <74fe56020905271931l4c8d4677h3bbcce6d8c8a8605@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:01:26AM +0530, Sujit K M wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Zachary Loafman <zml@freebsd.org> wrote: > > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/bsd/kern/kern_prot.c?v=xnu-1228 > > (see settid and setgroups1) > > How about the licensing. Darwin was open source under Apple's public > license, but no longer. Or is it Mach you are taking about? I'm not proposing porting the code directly, I'm merely asking whether the API and associated semantics are acceptable. It would be fairly straightforward for us to write a unit test that could run on both FreeBSD and OS X after this exercise. -- Zach Loafman | Staff Engineer | Isilon Systems
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090528024640.GC9388>