Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 19:55:45 +0200 From: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flowtable_cleaner/flowtable_flush livelock Message-ID: <86hbfbop5q.fsf@kopusha.home.net> In-Reply-To: <20101120165604.T24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 %2B0000 (UTC)") References: <86pqu0nexd.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20101120165604.T24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 17:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: BAZ> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Mikolaj Golub wrote: BAZ> Hi, >> Running something like below under VirtualBox (CURRENT, VIMAGE) BAZ> ... >> So the question is who is guilty in this situation? ULE? flowtable? Or >> jail/epair, which should not allow simultaneous entering of flowtable_flush? BAZ> In general: you for running an experimental feature;-) I like experimenting :-) BAZ> What you could try is: BAZ> http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20100216-10-ft-cv.diff I will. Thanks. -- Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hbfbop5q.fsf>