Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 01:28:29 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/boost Makefile Message-ID: <20040217012529.U36419@blues.jpj.net> In-Reply-To: <20040217062011.GA9902@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200402170536.i1H5avHr010411@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040217062011.GA9902@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Maybe BROKEN would be more suitable, unless the incorrect threading causes > > a security problem? > > No, but it causes runtime problems for people who link against it with > the default threads library, so BROKEN is inappropriate. Marking it BROKEN would prevent users from installing it at all, unless they edit out the BROKEN line--or is there something I'm missing? -- Trevor Johnson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040217012529.U36419>