Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:32:30 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "Featured ports of the month" Message-ID: <20040519223230.4030faa3.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <200405191550.34155@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> References: <200405191550.34155@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Wed__19_May_2004_22_32_30_+0200_Bm8hOCH1w/y5NbIG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 19 May 2004 15:50:34 -0400 Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > On a related subject -- the most popular ports. > > The simplest is to just collect and publish download statistics as > collected by ftp.FreeBSD.org and the major mirrors? > > More complex, but interesting would be to have ``make install'' send > an icmp (or udp) packet somewhere describing as much as the admin > wants it to describe -- from merely the portname (default) to "the > works" -- including portversion, build options, `uname -a`. > > The reporting program (say, portreport) can be a port in itself. Once > it is installed, installing any port will automaticly invoke it. The > aggregated results can be published on a web-site. It should be easier/faster to port debian popularity contest: http://popcon.debian.org/ clem --Signature=_Wed__19_May_2004_22_32_30_+0200_Bm8hOCH1w/y5NbIG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAq8RfsRhfjwcjuh0RAhjAAKDAVDCBlolxHiGtYb4ICw4FDFqvIwCguozd BLRBpj4eY4GHzTt9uL/LY8k= =IBo+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__19_May_2004_22_32_30_+0200_Bm8hOCH1w/y5NbIG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040519223230.4030faa3.sheepkiller>