Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:52:54 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nclayton@lehman.com> To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp> Cc: jdp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation Message-ID: <19990628115254.E15628@lehman.com> In-Reply-To: <199906280427.AAA29177@smtp4.erols.com>; from John Baldwin on Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:27:21AM -0400 References: <199906251220.VAA22552@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> <199906280427.AAA29177@smtp4.erols.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 28, 1999 at 12:27:21AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > A. Why 'ja' is better than 'ja.*' > > ---------------------------------- > > No offense, but your arguments apply to a specific case, i.e. "ja", and Nik is > trying to setup a generic structure that will be easily extensible and > consistent. That is why "en" is changing to "en_US.iso-8859-1" or something > similar. We understand that it's just bit flipping to do JIS -> SJIS -> EUC, > but please understand that Nik is proposing a system that is bigger than the > doc/ja tree. It is the doc/ tree. Also, the end user will still have > /usr/share/man/ja and /usr/share/doc/ja.. this is only for the CVS repository. > Please try to see the big picture here instead of just looking at the "ja" > stuff. Everyone else has to adjust to this change, too. Thank God for that. Someone else gets it :-) Cheers John, N -- --+==[ Systems Administrator, Year 2000 Test Lab, Lehman Brothers, Inc. ]==+-- --+==[ 1 Broadgate, London, EC2M 7HA 0171-601-0011 x5514 ]==+-- --+==[ Year 2000 Testing: It's about time. . . ]==+-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990628115254.E15628>