Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 23:43:55 -0500 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/make.conf question Message-ID: <20020313044355.GC21174@laptop.lambertfam.org> In-Reply-To: <1015976004.43954.1.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> References: <4.3.2.20020312135845.0369fc20@207.227.119.2> <94LKWSXTSPD0LI73HF86RP3VNKJ3W09.3c8e8564@VicNBob> <20020312175405.A96638@blackhelicopters.org> <1015976004.43954.1.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:33:24PM -0500, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 17:54, Michael Lucas wrote: > > You know, how are we supposed to have a long discussion and ramble > > into obscure corners of the system, if you go and look at the source > > for a definitive answer? :-) > > > > > # Short hand for `make buildkernel installkernel' > > > # > > > kernel: buildkernel installkernel > > Last I checked, the only reason to separate the two was to allow a > single /usr/obj to be used to NFS-upgrade multiple (identical) systems. One other reason, also involves NFS, when your build server is 1Ghz and your target machine is 200Mhz. Besides builds go faster on local disks. I usually spend all day building world, and the kernels for each machine. Then, during the maintenance window, I only have to do installs. This lets me get a few more machines upgraded in the same window. Now if only I can get these, inherited, 2.2.7-CURRENT boxes up to 4.x I'll be happy. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org http://www.lambertfam.org/~lambert/resume.html 3 years Sr. SysAdmin experience with FreeBSD in small & medium size ISPs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020313044355.GC21174>