Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 00:31:16 -0453.75 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Storage question Message-ID: <55EFC2DA.3020101@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <55EF5409.8020007@yahoo.com> References: <55EF3D23.5060009@hiwaay.net> <20150908220639.20412cbd@gumby.homeunix.com> <55EF5409.8020007@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/08/15 16:39, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-questions wrote:
> Just curious, why not ZFS? It is extremely stable and then you don't
> have to worry about properly sizing but you can limit the size of a
> parition from growing out of control. Due to the pooling, you have
> access to all your storage on the drive to all the partitions.
>
> P.
>
Good question. 1 of the new boxen (the one that is tight for storage) is
tight for CPU, quad-core AMD A4-5000, 1.5 GHz, not much firepower, &
will be tasked w/ MythTV by default, so I guessed that adding ZFS might
overpower it. I otherwise agree w/ the advantages of ZFS.
<snip>
--
William A. Mahaffey III
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
-- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55EFC2DA.3020101>