Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:09:09 -0400 From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: "Pete French" <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dreadful gmirror performance, though each half works fine Message-ID: <5f67a8c40804171109o264ad120wa442f21be8a4bb33@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E1JmS8Z-000BPO-9x@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> References: <E1JmS8Z-000BPO-9x@dilbert.ticketswitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> wrote: > I am trying to run a system with a pair of drives mirrored under > gmirror, one of thhem being local and the other remote using ggated. > I have experimented with this rather extensively and have operationally decided not to use ggated in combination with gmirror --- it doesn't appear to work as well as one might expect. Some improvements were made to ggated awhile ago --- to improve error recovery. It should have helped, but didn't. I'm somewhat vaguely wondering if zfs with one local and one ggated disk will work well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5f67a8c40804171109o264ad120wa442f21be8a4bb33>