Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:51:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: Doug@gorean.org, rivers@dignus.com Cc: ady@warpnet.ro, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk, scrappy@hub.org Subject: Re: -stable (in)stability (was Re: Best version of FBSD for INN ?) Message-ID: <199909262351.TAA29273@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <37EE88B5.627D77F1@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If you are interested in tracking this problem you should subscribe to > -stable, which is a low-volume list most of the time. Thanks, I'll add that list to the others I'm on. Particularly since it is low-volume. Believe me, I know getting multiple copies or mis-directed e-mails is aggravating! You mention that 3.3-RELEASE won't be the same as -Stable. Is there some way for a resource-constraint environment to assist with debugging issues in this situation? Perhaps, in this case, -Stable hasn't moved very far (as 3.3-RELEASE was just produced?) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909262351.TAA29273>