Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:41:34 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/io iodev.c
Message-ID:  <20080812144134.GC1803@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20080812141521.GX99951@hoeg.nl>
References:  <200808081343.m78DhwYE068477@repoman.freebsd.org> <200808081226.32089.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080809130929.P77335@delplex.bde.org> <200808091555.25020.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080812014937.E21092@besplex.bde.org> <20080812231130.D760@besplex.bde.org> <20080812141521.GX99951@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello all,
>=20
> * Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > I checked that bpf panics (even under UP) due to the obvious bugs in
> > its d_close():
> >
> >     # Generate lots of network activity using something like:
> >     sysctl net.inet.icmp.icmplim=3D0; ping -fq localhost &
> >
> >     # Race to panic eventually:
> >     while :; do tcpdump -i lo0 & sleep 0.001; revoke /dev/bpf0
> >
> > Most or all device drivers have obvious bugs in their d_close(); bpf
> > is just a bit easier to understand and more likely to cause a panic
> > than most device drivers, since it is simple and frees resources.  A
> > panic is very likely when si_drv1 is freed, and si_drv1 is only locked
> > accidentally.
>=20
> I remember I once warned people about this on the lists. It seems the
> cdevpriv API is protected against this, so the following patch turns BPF
> into a single device node, which can handle revoke() calls properly.
>=20
> I wrote this patch a month ago, but eventually I didn't commit this. I
> think I should, though.
>=20
> 	http://80386.nl/files/bpf-cdevpriv.diff

Did you tested cdevpriv'ed bpf against revoke ?=20

--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkihoR4ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4hUkgCgvcyvZcaq22HKyvj145/tD5KU
P4QAoIDjgU0ONMB7gZPnDIXGLOWZJfVc
=Ci6V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VywGB/WGlW4DM4P8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080812144134.GC1803>