Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:07:05 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net>
Subject:   Re: Any hope of compiling firefox port on ARM?
Message-ID:  <6BC178F2-D183-4296-969B-9883904AC8DC@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <r30p-8pt0-wny@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20170418184716.GA69314@www.zefox.net> <12076A34-887D-4850-888E-3C687B65AA4E@FreeBSD.org> <r30p-8pt0-wny@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_6E579A68-0763-4F94-ADA8-8E37DBF4B87F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On 18 Apr 2017, at 21:43, Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> writes:
>=20
>> On 18 Apr 2017, at 20:47, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote:
>>=20
>>>=20
>>> For some time (years?) firefox compiles have failed with an error =
message
>>> along the lines of
>>>=20
>>> Assertion failed: (isReg() && "This is not a register operand!"),
>>> function getReg, file
>>> /usr/src/contrib/llvm/include/llvm/MC/MCInst.h, line 64.
>>> c++: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap (core dumped)
>>> c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to =
see invocation)
>>> FreeBSD clang version 4.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_400/final 297347) (based =
on LLVM 4.0.0)
>>> Target: armv6--freebsd12.0-gnueabihf
>>> Thread model: posix
>>> InstalledDir: /usr/bin
>>> c++: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ and include the crash backtrace,
>>> preprocessed source, and associated run script.
>>>=20
>>> Is there any hope of a fix, whether to clang or firefox?
>>=20
>> Have you tried doing what it asks, e.g. file a bug report? :)
>>=20
>> I can find no such bug report in our tracker.  Please submit a bug =
with
>> the two files (.sh and .cpp) it generates in /tmp.
>=20
> See bug 211069 which was duped against bug 203989 that triggered a
> different assertion.

Hmm, annoying that bugzilla doesn't find those bugs, if you search for
any keyword in the error message.  So this bug has been solved for 6
months now, in any case.

-Dimitry


--Apple-Mail=_6E579A68-0763-4F94-ADA8-8E37DBF4B87F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30

iEYEARECAAYFAlj2cfEACgkQsF6jCi4glqN9eACgmWxDY8VJtflu6Ou3lrDE4pva
/rcAn0KGRUre+selmvNN3bo0Ecqzgx8G
=HZIh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_6E579A68-0763-4F94-ADA8-8E37DBF4B87F--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6BC178F2-D183-4296-969B-9883904AC8DC>