Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:01:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, alfred@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, yar@comp.chem.msu.su
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271757570.28508@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <200708271757.01674.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <200708270850.20904.jhb@freebsd.org> <200708271715.21462.jhb@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271719510.28508@sea.ntplx.net> <200708271757.01674.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, John Baldwin wrote:

> On Monday 27 August 2007 05:38:08 pm Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>> it is today.
>>>
>>> So you want to just bump the version everytime a change happens in HEAD?
>>
>> No, I don't see how you get that from what I said...
>
> You originally objected to having fts compat symbols as 1.0 and wanted the new
> fts to be 1.0.  Now you are saying that the new fts can be 1.1 and the old
> ones (only used in old current) can remain 1.0.
>
> That is, now you are saying to do what Yar originally wanted to do before you
> objected.

No, I still think they should be 1.0 or wait till after the
release.  I just made some assumption for the sake of giving
an example.

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0708271757570.28508>