Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:32:33 +0200 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> Cc: sub.mesa@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, wonslung@gmail.com, bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE/amd64 - full ZFS install - low read and write disk performance Message-ID: <4B5DE3C1.4060508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee01001251002x3ab0ecf6p1d8be5e31836320f@mail.gmail.com> References: <deb820501001250058ye0b798ayeccb2583a08558dd@mail.gmail.com> <E1NZN87-000JtL-Gy@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> <ed91d4a81001250904p1911f2d3y7250346387e69242@mail.gmail.com> <4B5DD7A2.4000101@FreeBSD.org> <cf9b1ee01001251002x3ab0ecf6p1d8be5e31836320f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Naumov wrote: > Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you > think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS: > > http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H > http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y Unluckily I haven't yet touched Atom family close yet, so I can't say about it's performance. But higher desktop level (even bit old) ICH9R chipset there is IMHO a good option. It is MUCH better then ICH7, often used with previous Atoms. If I had nice small Mini-ITX case with 6 drive bays, I would definitely look for some board like that to build home storage. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B5DE3C1.4060508>