Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 20:10:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: Jake Dias <jake@pcug.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IBCS2 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960819200939.337C-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <E0usTKd-0005BZ-00@june.pcug.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Jake Dias wrote: > Are there two ibcs2 emulators in -current? Nope. It's two ways to do the same thing. > ie the built in one "options IBCS2" > And the lkm one which can be loaded by running "ibcs2" > > Both cannot be used simultaneously. I get "multiply defined" error messages > > Which is better? If one is better shouldn't the other one be removed? Personal preference. I personally prefer to bloat the kernel and compile them in, since I haven't had the best of luck with LKMs and I have *pleny* of memory. :) Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.960819200939.337C-100000>