Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:27:50 +0200 From: Nagilum <freebsd@nagilum.org> To: "Reed L. O'Brien" <reedobrien@acm.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf Message-ID: <40C4C1B6.2040808@nagilum.org> In-Reply-To: <c9tsc1$eec$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <c9tsc1$eec$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Not just CURRENT, you can have pf on STABLE too: http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ ALTQ is not ready for all interfaces but the apart from that it's fully functional. Have fun, Alex. Reed L. O'Brien wrote: > I thought I read in the CURRENT docs somewhere that pf was going to be > the default packet filter. Was I hallucinating? Anyone seen it? > > Also anyone using pf on FreeBSD 5.x? > Is it fully implemented? is it as solid as ipfilter? > I have never used ipfw or ipfw2 so please don't refer to them without > great detail on their part of the comparison....I won't get it > > TIA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C4C1B6.2040808>