Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Mar 2002 23:39:39 -0500 (EST)
From:      Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>
To:        "Brian T.Schellenberger" <bts@babbleon.org>
Cc:        "Justin L. Boss" <jlboss@yahoo.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: NVIDIA  3D FreeBSD Drivers
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.21.0203032337160.17428-100000@rac3.wam.umd.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020304032812.D6305BA05@i8k.babbleon.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Brian T.Schellenberger wrote:

> On Sunday 03 March 2002 09:53 pm, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > I don't think I'm missing your point, I just disagree with it.
> > >
> > > Instead of fighting for FreeBSD I'd rather fight for open source
> > > software, and the nvidia Linux "solution" is to include Linux in their
> > > closed-source world.  You want them to include FreeBSD in their
> > > closed-source world as well.
> > >
> > > This seems more like betrayal to the cause than fighting for the cause to
> > > me, and I, for one, am not going to fight for that.
> > >
> > > A petition for them to release their information so that FreeBSD *and*
> > > other O/S's could take advantage of their hardware--*that*, I would
> > > support.
> > >
> > > But not this.
> >
> > So let me get this straight... You would rather wait for something that is
> > never going to happen than see usable 3d drivers come out for
> > FreeBSD. This is unrealistic. Nvidia is legally unable to release source
> > for their drivers, and I think we should be happy that they want to
> > support FreeBSD at all. There is no legal or moral obligation for them to
> > release specs for their cards or open-source drivers. The fact that they
> > are releasing drivers at all is enough for me (and most other people that
> > actually want to USE the 3d support that they paid for.)
> 
> True. 
> 
> And I'm under no legal or moral obligation to buy their products as long as 
> they insist on sticking with proprietary solutions.
> 
> I still find this "legal obligation" not to release them to be so much 
> gobbly-gook: They *chose* to use solutions that were so encumbered, and I 
> *choose* to avoid them as a result.
> 
> I'd be happy to encourage them to pursue other strategies.  I don't want to 
> join some movement to beg the corporacracy to drop some scraps in our bowl, 
> too.  I'm not going to prostitute myself that way.
> 
> I do all my prostitution on company time instead :-)
> 
> [I really don't think of myself as being nearly as much of an open-source 
> radical as I seem to be coming across in this little debate, but I guess I 
> wish that we could have enough pride in what FreeBSD has accomplished as a 
> freeware project that we wouldn't let the attractiveness of a slightly 
> smoother curve on the blast from the frag granade have us all begging to be 
> treated just like the "big boys" of the O/S's.]
> 
> [[Really, I never I knew I felt this strongly about it before . . . ]]

basically I got my video card for free. I don't want to pay for another
card. I'd much rather get 3d drivers for the card I have. 

Ken


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0203032337160.17428-100000>