Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 11:09:50 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234005] www/redmine: Update to 4.0.0 Message-ID: <bug-234005-21402-uab3hMjUmf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234005-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-234005-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234005 --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to cedric from comment #2) Understood and understandable. I think it would be good to add it to the wiki nonetheless, so I'll do that. Similar to Python, I think the answer to the last question might comprise something like: Use RVM or equivalent/similar virtual environment to install ruby applicati= on stacks above the 'ruby language' (ruby language freebsd package) layer. I w= ould include 'rails' in the definition of application layer. Concretely, that would mean: - Install lang/rubyXX port/package that redmine4 requires - Install postgresql port/package you want. - Use rvm (or equiv) to create per customer/instance virtual environments t= hat install redmine and everything else above that. Alternatively, since you don't require plugins, in particular the ones we h= ave in ports that are probably blockers/required to update the redmine port, you could run a local version of the redmine port, updated to 4.x. I wouldn't g= uess that the port delta to 4.x would be huge. Which makes me think of another option: to create a www/redmine4 port, leav= ing www/redmine as it is (on 3.x) to be deprecated someday. There are plenty of other examples in ports where we have version-suffixed ports of the same software for each major/branch version. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234005-21402-uab3hMjUmf>