Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 11:19:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com> To: FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: tuning a CPU bound server Message-ID: <20020520111759.I35309-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> In-Reply-To: <3CE6E08A.4CD26B1C@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > Brandon D. Valentine(bandix@geekpunk.net)@2002.05.17 14:48:07 +0000: > > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Doug White wrote: > > > >You are welcome to rewrite qmail to use kqueue if you wish :) > > > > > > Although if I read the license correctly you hand djb a contract for > > > your soul and first born child if you do. ;-) > > > > if you read the license _correctly_, you'd just distribute a patch, and > > that's perfectly okay. so, what about to do with your soul and first born > > child now? ;-) > > Spend them maintaining the patch, when DJB fails to integrate the > patch into the main line source for qmail? > > -- Terry Sounds like an ideal use of the ports system. The qmail port already has several patches, so the incremental effort may not be too bad. Adrian -- [ adrian@ubergeeks.com ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020520111759.I35309-100000>