Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 02:55:24 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>, Abdullah Tariq <ab.tariq90@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NETGRAPH- bridge vlans using netgraph help Message-ID: <5AE4D1AC.3080702@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ62BQ3WZVvpZ0D9UJFcV4stXm-prE=GDp-JconSktQzpA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPFxuwQOBkGTHZbGfJz=-fUW8M%2BQGOpTM9T%2B-RO6H4fWcGEtqA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE216DC.7010905@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwSEDTNhfn1%2B1nXPAC6skJt%2BdAych10FN9bwwBVdqevO2w@mail.gmail.com> <5AE33513.1000001@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRceDDoTw-4EohRdjUMSE-YN4YKWhbObuvEpxzEWOh2_A@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34754.6040905@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ5TwZnnW%2B1TT7urq_0pgb=sM_VwH4x0eq0363MCdb7hw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE34CFA.7000207@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwR54nPiKAAACRY5a_GvDNOVfdniqv6F_3PK4--7vm03uA@mail.gmail.com> <5AE437C1.8010706@grosbein.net> <CAFZYVy7_nVm5G1XDdM_TujN=jVbCyDEKABGbC=M9L5Lh1jAAzQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AE44ADD.7020302@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwQ=Gi7GiVr%2BsdTavr6r44ftaeFDOvN7%2B3qi_7aZyH6kXw@mail.gmail.com> <5AE468D5.9030702@grosbein.net> <CAPFxuwRdLrEmtVHGSruja6L-bcOi0Z59ae5mB1gWgi-PvU6inw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6m=j6aY7nbeppCK9TTAJ1P%2BfN7Hs5sZ3CfWc7Ad4v_cA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ62BQ3WZVvpZ0D9UJFcV4stXm-prE=GDp-JconSktQzpA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
28.04.2018 21:57, Freddie Cash wrote: > If you want to think of it in switch terms, FreeBSD supports access ports (untagged vlan) and trunk ports (tagged vlans). > But there's no support for hybrid ports (tagged vlans with a PVID on the port that adds tags to untagged traffic). Not entirely correct. As FreeBSD is not a switch, it by default does not have nor need PVID notion at. However, FreeBSD still can bridge incoming untagged frames with arbitrary interface vlan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5AE4D1AC.3080702>