Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:20:05 +0100
From:      Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To:        Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OT: The future of USENET?
Message-ID:  <20130327212004.GA1571@tiny.Sisis.de>
In-Reply-To: <51535897.3000901@gmail.com>
References:  <CAD2Ti2-5GDjpOoue1gCb5ZJryT9b+1kEGkaehMkTk0CECxrr3w@mail.gmail.com> <kivkjp$hpg$1@ger.gmane.org> <51535897.3000901@gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
El día Wednesday, March 27, 2013 a las 03:37:43PM -0500, Joshua Isom escribió:

> The last ISP I knew had usenet complained about the bandwidth and 
> storage required.  They had a dedicated satellite instead of using their 
> backbone, and only cached a couple days.  All the porn and warez has the 
> side affect of wiping out the cost benefit.

I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.

	matthias
-- 
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook

Matthias Apitz               |  - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android
E-mail: guru@unixarea.de     |  - Never being an iSlave
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ |  - No proprietary attachments, no HTML/RTF in E-mail
phone: +49-170-4527211       |  - Respect for open standards



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130327212004.GA1571>