Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:24:06 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Andriy Bakay <andriy@irbisnet.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Serious zfs slowdown when mixed with another file system (ufs/msdosfs/etc.). Message-ID: <4CAEB906.10603@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <7C062F92-B514-49FF-BE28-90B7784A5CB6@irbisnet.com> References: <9cf48605f1dbddc7f1547b93715c1426@irbisnet.com> <4CAE11A2.1000604@icyb.net.ua> <61435f7c66c09f6cf48e39eab5999420@irbisnet.com> <4CAE1D72.20208@icyb.net.ua> <9037d8cbeb4716945204bc65e32a74f2@irbisnet.com> <4CAE45EA.5070607@icyb.net.ua> <7C062F92-B514-49FF-BE28-90B7784A5CB6@irbisnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 08/10/2010 01:24 Andriy Bakay said the following: > Ok. But how stable (production ready) the FreeBSD-8-STABLE is? What is your opinion? I use it all the time :-) (And head too). In general, and this opinion is not only my own, the best FreeBSD "release" is the latest stable branch. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CAEB906.10603>