Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jan 1997 21:13:50 -0800
From:      "Brandon C. Wood" <bwood@leland.Stanford.EDU>
To:        <dg@root.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ 
Message-ID:  <199701220513.VAA16135@mailhub.Stanford.EDU>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
OK...I installed it from a DOS partition.

----------
> From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
> To: Brandon C. Wood <bwood@leland.Stanford.EDU>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Intel Etherexpress Pro/10+ 
> Date: Tuesday, January 21, 1997 4:01 PM
> 
> >Does the Etherexpress Pro/100B PCI driver support the Etherexpress
Pro/10+
> >PCI card?  Intel claims it's based on the same chip (in fact, in Windows
> >95 and NT it says to use the 100B driver, which works fine), and FreeBSD
> >seems to detect its parameters ok, but when I try to do an FTP install,
it
> >fails to initialize the network interface.  I know my tcp/ip settings
are
> >correct, so I'm assuming it's a driver problem.
> 
>    The driver needs some minor changes to support the Pro/10+. If you can
get
> FreeBSD installed some other way, contact me after you've done that and I
can
> see about getting you a patch.
> 
> -DG
> 
> David Greenman
> Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701220513.VAA16135>