Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:58:52 +0200
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why diablo-jdk?
Message-ID:  <h6cjqv$88v$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090813162022.GA86679@keira.kiwi-computer.com>
References:  <200908131302.06949.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>	<1250149102.63923.1169.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <20090813162022.GA86679@keira.kiwi-computer.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig584D9E4CD4341A8077C82163
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rick C. Petty wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:08:22PM +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:02 +0930, Malcolm Kay wrote:
>>> It seems that many (if not most) posts to this list concern the=20
>>> Diablo version of jdk.
>>>
>>> Is there some particular merit in using this in preference to the
>>> regular FreeBSD port -- say jdk16?
>>>
>>> Your comment is welcome,
>>> Malcolm
>> I've been meaning to pose a related question.
>>
>> Why is it that in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.Mk java/diablo-jdk15 is
>> preferred over java/jdk16? In fact the order of preference seems to be=
:
>> diablo-jdk16, diablo-jdk15, openjdk6 then jdk16 ...
>=20
> I believe it's because building the non-diablo JDKs takes a significant=

> amount of time and drive space.  Most people don't want the hassle of
> compiling a JDK, especially since you need to bootstrap it with another=

> JDK.  It's a classic chicken and egg problem.  I think this way satisfi=
es
> more people.

Isn't there also something about diablo being put through Sun's=20
implementation/regression tests to be able to be distributed by the=20
Foundation?


--------------enig584D9E4CD4341A8077C82163
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqJ0pwACgkQldnAQVacBcikowCfWswY2dfaLMI0ynHP8WLAzIjs
JEAAn1LreoakDcrmAJkru5IkybRmEmOx
=xTAN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig584D9E4CD4341A8077C82163--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h6cjqv$88v$1>