Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:55:07 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC Message-ID: <11351.1270198507@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:33:53 MST." <20100402013353.f544e8ad.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20100402013353.f544e8ad.stas@FreeBSD.org>, Stanislav Sedov writes: >On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:26:13 +0900 >Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> mentioned: >Ports doesn't support cross-compilation yet, >and it would be a pity to find yourself >bootstrapping another tiny arm platform and >having to use ports to have a usable system. The result of the RFC was that bind is not a mandatory component to make "a usable system", so you argument suffers from bad logic. The fact that you want BIND on your arm, is no different from somebody else wanting postfix on a MIPS. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11351.1270198507>